Summary: Euler’s number is defined by the property that is (not only proportional to, but equal to) its own derivative; every other exponential is just a horizontally-scaled version of it.

In practice, everything is written as instead of because is directly readable as the growth rate:

  • , telling you immediately that the quantity grows at per unit time.
  • , where tells you directly the quantity grows at per unit time

What’s special about

From exponential-function, every is proportional to its own derivative with a base-specific constant :

For base 2, ; for base 3, . Somewhere between 2 and 3 the constant must equal exactly 1. That number is :

This isn’t a coincidence about — it’s the definition of . Asking “why does have this property?” is like asking “why does happen to be the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter?” The property is what picks out the number / the number emerges from the property).

A geometric restatement: at every point on the graph of , the slope of the tangent line equals the height of the curve at that point.

Intuition

Think of as your position on a number line at time , starting at . The condition “derivative = self” says your velocity always equals your position — the further from 0 you are, the faster you flee from it. This is the cleanest possible runaway-growth law.

The horizontal-rescaling fact

All exponentials are horizontally-scaled versions of each other. grows twice as fast as because . More generally, choosing a different base just means feeding the input through a constant scaling.

So we can always rewrite in the form . The chain rule then gives the derivative for free:

The proportionality constant moves out of “mystery limit” status and becomes whatever number we put in the exponent.

This works because is its own derivative — the one base where the proportionality constant is exactly . Rewriting then lets the chain rule do the rest: . See below.

All exponentials in terms of

Given any , the rescaling constant (, above) is the natural-logarithm of :

So:

This finally explains the mystery constants from exponential-function: , , (which is why ).

Why we always write exponentials this way

In applied calculus, almost nobody writes or . Everything is written as , because:

  • The derivative is trivial: .
  • The constant in the exponent is the proportionality constant between the quantity and its rate of change. For a population growing at 5% per unit time, . The number you want to read off is right there.
  • Differential equations of the form have solutions — no rewriting needed.

Connection to the complex case

The differential-equation characterisation (“derivative = times self, starting at 1”) is what extends beyond the reals — to complex numbers, matrices, and operators. The “repeated multiplication” intuition does not extend; only the dynamical one does. See complex-exponential-rotation.

There is also a group-theoretic restatement of what makes special: viewing as a homomorphism from the additive to the multiplicative group of complex numbers, is the unique base for which a vertical slide of 1 unit on the imaginary axis maps to a rotation of exactly 1 radian on the unit circle. (For base 2, you’d get radians per unit; for base 5, .) See group-theory-intro and complex-exponential-rotation.